AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs Intel Iris Graphics 540
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and Intel Iris Graphics 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 64 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 323 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 540
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1258 vs 549
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6284 vs 4157
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2308 vs 1080
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1237 vs 1114
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1716
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2308 vs 1080
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1237 vs 1114
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1258 vs 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6284 vs 4157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2308 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1237 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2308 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1237 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 1716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 540
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 1258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 323 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4157 | 6284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 3158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 2308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 3158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M335 | Intel Iris Graphics 540 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Exo | Skylake GT3e |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1045 | 1057 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M335 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
