Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon R5 M335
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1070 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1726 vs 549
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7343 vs 4668
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 14.536
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 vs 120.354
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1080
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 vs 1114
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1716
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1080
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 vs 1114
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1716
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 21 October 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1070 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 vs 549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 vs 4668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 vs 14.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 vs 120.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 vs 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 vs 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 1716 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 | 549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 577 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7343 | 4668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | 14.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | 120.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 1716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Exo |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 21 October 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1045 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1070 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1070 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |