Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon R5 M335

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1070 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 vs 549
  • Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7344 vs 4157
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 14.536
  • 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 vs 120.354
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2780 vs 1080
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 vs 1114
  • Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 1716
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2780 vs 1080
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 vs 1114
  • Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 1716
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 21 October 2015
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1070 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1739 vs 549
Geekbench - OpenCL 7344 vs 4157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.109 vs 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.116 vs 120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1884 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 vs 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780 vs 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1884 vs 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 vs 1716

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335

  • 3.6x more core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 363
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1070 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 vs 363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1739
549
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
363
577
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7344
4157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37.109
14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
465.116
120.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2780
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1884
1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2780
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1884
1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
1716
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 AMD Radeon R5 M335
PassMark - G3D Mark 1739 549
PassMark - G2D Mark 363 577
Geekbench - OpenCL 7344 4157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 37.109 14.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 465.116 120.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 54.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2780 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1884 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 1716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2780 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1884 1114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 1716
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 619

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 AMD Radeon R5 M335

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT3e Exo
Launch date 1 September 2017 21 October 2015
Place in performance rating 1042 1043
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1070 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1070 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 320
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Compute units 5
Floating-point performance 684.8 gflops
Texture fill rate 21.4 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
Vulkan

Memory

Memory type DDR3 / DDR4 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore