AMD Radeon R5 M335 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA GRID K160Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 21.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 262
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 262 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K160Q
- Around 62% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 628 vs 549
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 1080
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1871 vs 1114
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2654 vs 1716
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 1080
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1871 vs 1114
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2654 vs 1716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 vs 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1237 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1871 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2654 vs 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1237 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1871 vs 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2654 vs 1716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K160Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 628 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 262 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4668 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 1871 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 2654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 1237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 1871 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 2654 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GRID K160Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Exo | GK107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 October 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1042 | 1045 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1070 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M335 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
