AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 855 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 210

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

• Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1138 vs 649
• Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8829 vs 5059
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 13.812
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 144.604
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.981
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 18.55
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 65.872
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1087
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 1157
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2212
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1087
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 1157
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2212

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	649 1138
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	516 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5059 8829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.812 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	144.604 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.981 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.55 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.872 94.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1087 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1157 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2212 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1087 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1157 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2212 3214

Compare specifications (specs)