AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 855 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 207
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 21 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 207 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1140 vs 649
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8856 vs 5010
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 13.812
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 144.604
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.981
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 18.55
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 65.872
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1087
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1765 vs 1157
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2212
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1087
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1765 vs 1157
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2212
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 vs 649 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 vs 5010 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 vs 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 vs 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 vs 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 vs 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 vs 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 2212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 1140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 207 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5010 | 8856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | 20.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | 525.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | 2.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | 37.076 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | 94.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 1972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 1972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 | 3214 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Exo | Venus |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 21 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1181 | 1183 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | 625 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |