AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 468
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 16 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 468 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 1344 vs 320
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 649
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 5084
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 13.812
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 144.604
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 0.981
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 18.55
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 65.872
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 1087
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1157
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2212
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 1087
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1157
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2212
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 649 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 5084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 vs 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 vs 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 vs 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 2212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5084 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Exo | GK104 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 16 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1182 | 701 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |