AMD Radeon R5 M435 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M435 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M435
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 476.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4.6x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 896 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 999 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 165 vs 53
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 476.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 999 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 vs 53 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 36.9 billion / sec vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19512 vs 5816
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 2089
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 2089
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1208 vs 849
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 36.9 billion / sec vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 vs 5816 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 2089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 2089 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 vs 849 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M435
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5816 | 19512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2089 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2089 | 3342 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 | 53 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 849 | 1208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1621 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M435 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Jet | GT200 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 16 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1295 | 1396 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
| Price now | $95.38 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 476.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 36.9 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 111.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M435 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M435 vs
ATIRadeon 9000
AMDRadeon R5 M435 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600 Ultra
AMDRadeon R5 M435 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600 LE
AMDRadeon R5 M435 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
AMDRadeon R5 M435 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920M
AMDRadeon R5 M435 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M445
