AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 320 vs 80
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 104 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 7 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350
Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 141 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.131 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Cedar |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1544 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $23 | |
Price now | $50.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |