AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 650 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 559
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 218
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 1561
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 4.278
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 255.525
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.464
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 13.633
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 59.183
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1296
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1044
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2716
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1296
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1044
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2716

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 559
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 218
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 1561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 59.183
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 2716

Compare specifications (specs)