AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 vs 611
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 257
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5175 vs 1548
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.344 vs 4.874
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 259.769
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 vs 0.487
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 14.033
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 57.396
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1389
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 vs 611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 vs 257 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5175 vs 1548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 vs 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 vs 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 vs 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 vs 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 vs 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 1389 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 vs 2342
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 vs 2342
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 624 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 vs 2342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 vs 2342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 | 257 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5175 | 1548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | 4.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | 259.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | 0.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | 14.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | 57.396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | 1389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Turks |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
Place in performance rating | 1245 | 1247 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |