AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 902
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 274
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 5331
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 13.344
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 304.279 vs 290.632
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 1.262
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 21.59
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 60.326
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1688
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2342
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1688
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2342

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1051
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 283
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 7525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 20.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 304.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 1.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 30.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 96.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3356

Compare specifications (specs)