AMD Radeon R7 240 versus AMD Radeon R7 250

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R7 250 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 240

versus

AMD Radeon R7 250

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 240

Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt versus 75 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250

Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 780 MHz
Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.4 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 716.8 gflops versus 499.2 gflops
Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 versus 902
Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 versus 274
Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 versus 5331
Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 versus 13.344
Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 304.279 versus 290.632
Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 versus 1.262
Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 versus 21.59
Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 versus 60.326
Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 versus 1688
Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 versus 2342
Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 versus 1688
Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 versus 2342

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz versus 780 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	22.4 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 versus 320
Performance á point flottant	716.8 gflops versus 499.2 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1051 versus 902
PassMark - G2D Mark	283 versus 274
Geekbench - OpenCL	7525 versus 5331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	20.161 versus 13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	304.279 versus 290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.655 versus 1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.046 versus 21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	96.934 versus 60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2179 versus 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170 versus 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 versus 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2179 versus 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170 versus 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 versus 3353

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

902

1051

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

274

283

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5331

7525

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13.344

20.161

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

290.632

304.279

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.262

1.655

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.59

30.046

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

60.326

96.934

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1688

2179

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2342

3170

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1688

2179

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2342

3170

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3356

Nom	AMD Radeon R7 240	AMD Radeon R7 250
PassMark - G3D Mark	902	1051
PassMark - G2D Mark	274	283
Geekbench - OpenCL	5331	7525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.344	20.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	290.632	304.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.262	1.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.59	30.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	60.326	96.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1688	2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2342	3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1688	2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2342	3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R7 240	AMD Radeon R7 250
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Nom de code	Oland	Oland
Conception	AMD Radeon R7 200 Series	AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Date de sortie	8 October 2013	8 October 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$69	$89
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1236	1087
Prix maintenant	$49.99	$78.34
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	24.92	27.62
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	780 MHz	1050 MHz
Performance á point flottant	499.2 gflops	716.8 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	384
Stream Processors	320	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	15.6 GTexel / s	22.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,040 million	1,040 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
HDMI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Longeur	168 mm	168 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	N / A	N / A
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	72 GB/s	72 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1150 MHz	1150 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	DDR3 / GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
AppAcceleration