AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 142 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 5013
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.59 vs 20.453
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.326 vs 39.651

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1476 vs 902
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 274
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 306.122 vs 290.632
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.552 vs 1.262
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2079 vs 1688
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 2342
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2079 vs 1688
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 2342

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1476
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	274 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.344 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.632 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.262 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.59 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.326 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2342 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3350

Compare specifications (specs)