AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 6.9x better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 163
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 222
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 2883
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 8 January 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 vs 163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 vs 2883 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250 | AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 | 163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 | 2883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250 | AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Cedar |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
Place in performance rating | 1087 | 1088 |
Price now | $78.34 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 10.67 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1334 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |