Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 vs 283
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 vs 283 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 900
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1404
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1404
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 3025
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1139
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1139
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3331
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3331
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1051 vs 900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 vs 1404 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7525 vs 3025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | 1051 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 | 283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 2179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 2179 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3025 | 7525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1139 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1139 | 3170 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | AMD Radeon R7 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Oland |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1085 | 1087 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | |
| Price now | $78.34 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 6100 with others
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
AMDRadeon R7 350
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
