AMD Radeon R7 250E vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 720 MHz
• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 17.28 GTexel / s
• 3.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 144
• Around 98% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 414.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 70 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 vs 10.32
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 306.536
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 vs 0.883
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 vs 18.564
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 vs 35.369
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 1893
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3323
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 1893
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3323

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.562 10.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	582.073 306.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.2 0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.669 18.564
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.052 35.369
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2873 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2873 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3356

Compare specifications (specs)