Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 20 December 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 1404
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 1404
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1139
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1139
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3331
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3331
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3331 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 2873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 2873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3026 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1139 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1139 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | AMD Radeon R7 250E | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 20 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1082 | 1083 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |