AMD Radeon R7 250E vs NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 12.8x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 9x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 500 MHz
Launch date | 20 December 2013 vs 6 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kelvin |
Code name | Cape Verde | NV25 A3 |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 | 6 February 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1080 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |