AMD Radeon R7 250E vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 vs 35.452
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 vs 61.984
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 vs 1105
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1974
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3246
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 vs 1105
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1974
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3246
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 vs 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 vs 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3246 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 512
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 vs 21.562
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 vs 582.073
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 vs 2.2
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 vs 21.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 vs 582.073 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 vs 2.2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3246 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK104 |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1084 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |