AMD Radeon R7 250E versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 250E and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250E
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 17.28 GTexel / s
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 144
- Environ 98% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 414.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 70 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.562 versus 10.32
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 versus 306.536
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 versus 0.883
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 versus 18.564
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 versus 35.369
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2873 versus 1893
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 3323
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2873 versus 1893
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 3323
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 20 December 2013 versus 14 May 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 720 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 414.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 70 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 versus 10.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 versus 306.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 versus 0.883 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 versus 18.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 versus 35.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 versus 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 versus 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3323 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | 10.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | 306.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | 0.883 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | 18.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | 35.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1111 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3693 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 250E | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 20 December 2013 | 14 May 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $149 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 1086 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $55.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 250E avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4200
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 250E vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
