AMD Radeon R7 250E vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 512 vs 400
- Around 86% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1684
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1684
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3070
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 vs 23 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3070 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 55 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250E | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 1684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3070 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 528 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1186 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250E | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Cape Verde | Pinewood |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 | 23 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1085 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |