AMD Radeon R7 350 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 74% better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 vs 7787
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 25.508
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 647.813
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 2.72
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 44.6
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 109.558
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 2072
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3122
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 2072
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7787 11724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.508 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	647.813 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.72 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.6 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.558 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356

Compare specifications (specs)