AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7955 vs 6869
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3127 vs 2490
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3127 vs 2490
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3329
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7955 vs 6869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 vs 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2097
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2097
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 2097 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7955 | 6869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2097 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2097 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 | 3329 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Oland | GM107 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 807 | 953 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM vs
AMDFirePro M4100
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM vs
AMDRadeon 530X
