AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FirePro V9800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 360

ATI FirePro V9800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3138 vs 2727
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 vs 9.718
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 738.1
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 vs 0.867
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 27.153
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 vs 118.756

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 June 2015 vs 9 September 2010
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3138 vs 2727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.068 vs 9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	819.203 vs 738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.386 vs 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	58.285 vs 27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	188.858 vs 118.756

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800

Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 1600 vs 768
Around 69% better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
4.4x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 516

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	68.0 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1600 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,720.0 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	655 vs 516

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3138

2727

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

516

655

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.068

9.718

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

819.203

738.1

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.386

0.867

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

58.285

27.153

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

188.858

118.756

Name	AMD Radeon R7 360	ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G3D Mark	3138	2727
PassMark - G2D Mark	516	655
Geekbench - OpenCL	16200
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.068	9.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	819.203	738.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.386	0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	58.285	27.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	188.858	118.756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1402

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 360	ATI FirePro V9800
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Tobago	Cypress
Design	AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch date	18 June 2015	9 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$3,499
Place in performance rating	627	630
Price now	$146.65
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	29.24
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	2,720.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	1600
Stream Processors	768
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s	68.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	2,080 million	2,154 million
Core clock speed		850 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	165 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12	11.2 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	147.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1050 MHz	4600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)