AMD Radeon R7 360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 175x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 487
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 vs 11364
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 vs 30.505
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 705.293
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 vs 3.085
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 35.416
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 vs 62.69
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 3581
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3690
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 3581
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3690
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1402 vs 1307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 vs 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 vs 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 vs 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 vs 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 vs 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 vs 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 3690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 vs 1307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 3140
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 3140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 360 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tobago | GK106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 6 September 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 601 | 740 |
| Price now | $146.65 | $349.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | 14.35 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 165 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
