AMD Radeon R7 370 vs AMD FirePro R5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 62.4 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 58% better floating-point performance: 1,997 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4519 vs 2647
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3342
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 25 February 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.4 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4519 vs 2647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 605
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 vs 605 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4519 | 2647 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 | 625 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3342 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 370 | AMD FirePro R5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Trinidad | Pitcairn |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 25 February 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $1,099 |
| Place in performance rating | 406 | 402 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 62.4 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 152 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 975 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 370 with others
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
ATIFireGL V8650
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIATesla K20m
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
