AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 960
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,997 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 162.5x more memory clock speed: 975 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4499 vs 4017
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 610 vs 487
- 7.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 11364
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 vs 30.505
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 vs 705.293
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.267 vs 3.085
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 vs 35.416
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 359.237 vs 62.69
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7102 vs 3581
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7102 vs 3581
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1499 vs 1307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 960 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 975 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 vs 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 vs 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 vs 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 vs 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 vs 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 vs 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 vs 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 vs 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 vs 1307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 62.4 GTexel / s
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 62.4 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Trinidad | GK106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 6 September 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 411 | 740 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 960 |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 62.4 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 152 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 975 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 370 with others
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
ATIRadeon X1800 GTO²
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GX2
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 XT
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
NVIDIATesla K20m
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
AMDRadeon R7 370 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370
