AMD Radeon R7 370 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 960
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,997 gflops versus 1,981 gflops
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 162.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 975 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4499 versus 4017
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 610 versus 487
- 7.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 11364
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.514 versus 30.505
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 versus 705.293
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.267 versus 3.085
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 versus 35.416
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 359.237 versus 62.69
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7102 versus 3581
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7102 versus 3581
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1499 versus 1307
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 6 September 2012 |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops versus 1,981 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 975 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 versus 4017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 versus 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 versus 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 versus 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 versus 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 versus 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 versus 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 versus 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 versus 1307 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 975 MHz
- Environ 26% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 62.4 GTexel / s
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 975 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 62.4 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 | 4017 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Trinidad | GK106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 6 September 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 411 | 740 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 960 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.4 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 140 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 2,540 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 152 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | One 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 975 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |