AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 3.9x more texture fill rate: 62.4 GTexel / s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
  • 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,997 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1792 MB
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4511 vs 2060
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 426
  • 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 23008
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 June 2015 vs 27 July 2010
Texture fill rate 62.4 GTexel / s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1024 vs 320
Floating-point performance 1,997 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1792 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4511 vs 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark 606 vs 426
Geekbench - OpenCL 86561 vs 23008

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 3707
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 3359
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 3707
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 3359
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5249 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7205 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5249 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7205 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4511
2060
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
606
426
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
86561
23008
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
7205
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
7205
Name AMD Radeon R7 370 NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 4511 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark 606 426
Geekbench - OpenCL 86561 23008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 359.237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 7205
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 7205
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1499

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 370 NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Trinidad GF100
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch date 18 June 2015 27 July 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Place in performance rating 420 419
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 975 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,997 gflops 518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1024 320
Stream Processors 1024
Texture fill rate 62.4 GTexel / s 16.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million 3,100 million
Core clock speed 405 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 152 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1792 MB
Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s 76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 975 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
ECC (Error Correcting Code)