AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 370

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
3.9x more texture fill rate: 62.4 GTexel / s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,997 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.3x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1792 MB
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4516 vs 2060
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 426
3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 23008

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 June 2015 vs 27 July 2010
Texture fill rate	62.4 GTexel / s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,997 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1792 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4516 vs 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark	606 vs 426
Geekbench - OpenCL	86561 vs 23008

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 110 Watt
2.5x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 3707
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 3359
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 3707
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	5249 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7205 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	5249 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7205 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4516

2060

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

606

426

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

86561

23008

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

7205

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

7205

Name	AMD Radeon R7 370	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	4516	2060
PassMark - G2D Mark	606	426
Geekbench - OpenCL	86561	23008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	359.237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	7205
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	7205
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1499

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 370	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Trinidad	GF100
Design	AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch date	18 June 2015	27 July 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	420	419
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	975 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,997 gflops	518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1024	320
Stream Processors	1024
Texture fill rate	62.4 GTexel / s	16.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,100 million
Core clock speed		405 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	152 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1792 MB
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	975 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
ECC (Error Correcting Code)