AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 8 January 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 370
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2817 vs 1090
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13719 vs 5924
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3341
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2817 vs 1090 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13719 vs 5924 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 2817 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | 13719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Tahiti |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 8 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 699 | 682 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 3,315 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 103.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |