AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 June 2016 vs 8 January 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3348

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • 5.5x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
  • 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
  • 5.5x better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 370
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2817 vs 1090
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13719 vs 5924
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3341
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3341
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed 925 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 103.6 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 384
Floating-point performance 3,315 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 374 vs 370
PassMark - G3D Mark 2817 vs 1090
Geekbench - OpenCL 13719 vs 5924
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 vs 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 vs 3341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
370
374
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1090
2817
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5924
13719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3341
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3341
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3348
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3348
Name AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark 370 374
PassMark - G3D Mark 1090 2817
Geekbench - OpenCL 5924 13719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3341 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3341 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 795.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.328
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 181.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4396

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Oland Tahiti
Launch date 30 June 2016 8 January 2013
Place in performance rating 699 682
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops 3,315 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 1792
Texture fill rate 18.72 GTexel / s 103.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 4,313 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 240.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5