AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 370 vs 212
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 623
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5924 vs 1946
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 1494
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 1494
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1833
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1833
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 27 March 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 vs 212 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 623 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 vs 1946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1833 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 212 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 623 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | 1946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 1833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Oland | GK208B |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 699 | 1488 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Price now | $34.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
