AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5809 vs 3766
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 June 2012 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 vs 3766 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 vs 1616
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 vs 1616
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 1704
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 1704
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 223
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1173 vs 608
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 vs 1616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 vs 1616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 1704 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 223 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1173 vs 608 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 | 3766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1616 | 2375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1616 | 2375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 3328 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 295 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 608 | 1173 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.637 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.86 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | GK107 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1175 | 1178 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Price now | $59.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 A360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti200
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
IntelUHD Graphics
