AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A360 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 45% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5809 vs 4919
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 30 May 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 vs 4919 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1616
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1616
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 1704
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 1704
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 223
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1263 vs 608
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 vs 1616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 vs 1616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 1704 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 vs 223 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1263 vs 608 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5809 | 4919 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1616 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1616 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 3341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 262 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 608 | 1263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.598 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 404.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.123 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1857 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 A360 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Opal | GF116 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 30 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1171 | 1174 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 24.8 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 A360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti200
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670M
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
AMDRadeon R7 A360 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640
