AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 115 Watt
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 17 December 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 526.8 gflops
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.189 vs 15.145
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 798.239 vs 206.354
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.223 vs 1.2
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.294 vs 24.15
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 240.395 vs 85.46
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 526.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 vs 15.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 vs 206.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 vs 1.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 vs 24.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 vs 85.46 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 798.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 4.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 45.294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 240.395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Wani | Bonaire |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 17 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1435 | 570 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |