AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 260 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 7.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 115 Watt
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 17 December 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260
- Environ 45% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 758 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 48 GTexel / s versus 16.46 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 526.8 gflops
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.189 versus 15.145
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 798.239 versus 206.354
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.223 versus 1.2
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.294 versus 24.15
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 240.395 versus 85.46
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 758 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s versus 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 526.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 versus 15.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 versus 206.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 versus 1.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 versus 24.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 versus 85.46 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 26.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 798.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 4.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 45.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 240.395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Wani | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 17 December 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 570 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 2,080 million |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 104 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon 7200
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 515
