AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R9 270

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270

• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 758 MHz
• 4.5x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
• 4.5x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 526.8 gflops
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 22612
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.721 vs 15.145
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 206.354
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 1.2
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 24.15
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 261.843 vs 85.46
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3448 vs 1979
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2101
• 102.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3448 vs 33.5
• 109.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 33.9
• 55.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 60
• Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1603 vs 1457

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22612 74175
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.145 55.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	206.354 1282.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.2 5.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.15 93.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	85.46 261.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1979 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.5 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.9 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60 3347
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1457 1603

Compare specifications (specs)