AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 Graphics und AMD Radeon R9 270 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 10x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 vs 13 November 2013 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3347 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 270
- Etwa 22% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 925 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 4.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 74 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 384
- 4.5x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,368 gflops vs 526.8 gflops
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 22612
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.721 vs 15.145
- 6.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 206.354
- 4.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 1.2
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 24.15
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 261.843 vs 85.46
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3448 vs 1979
- Etwa 76% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2101
- 102.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3448 vs 33.5
- 109.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 33.9
- 55.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 60
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1603 vs 1457
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 925 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 74 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,368 gflops vs 526.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 22612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 vs 15.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 vs 206.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 vs 1.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 vs 24.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 vs 85.46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 vs 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 2101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 vs 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 60 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 vs 1457 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 74175 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 55.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 1282.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 5.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 93.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 261.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 1603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Wani | Curacao |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 | 13 November 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1435 | 501 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 758 MHz | 925 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 1280 |
Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Länge | 210 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 6-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 179.2 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |