AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Intel HD Graphics 2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
51.6x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1039

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011
Pipelines	384 vs 6
Floating-point performance	526.8 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

4.3x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 758 MHz
51.6x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
17.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1039 vs 60

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 758 MHz
Texture fill rate	850 MTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1039 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

1039

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1039

Name	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 2000
Geekbench - OpenCL	22612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	206.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	85.46
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1979
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2101
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	60	1039
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1457
PassMark - G2D Mark		456
PassMark - G3D Mark		213

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 2000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Generation 6.0
Code name	Wani	Sandy Bridge GT1
Launch date	31 May 2016	5 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1435	718
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	758 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	526.8 gflops	10.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	384	6
Texture fill rate	16.46 GTexel / s	850 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.1
Memory
Memory type	System Shared
Memory bus width		64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory		1