AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 10x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2262
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 3.422
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 195.811
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 781
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 754
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1397
- 6.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 vs 233
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 vs 195.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 vs 233 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 758 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 23.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 vs 33.5
- 22.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 754 vs 33.9
- 23.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 vs 60
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 758 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 vs 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 vs 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 vs 60 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 195.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 233 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Wani | Broadwell GT2 |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1435 | 1478 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,410 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 Graphics with others
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon 7200
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 515
