AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 200 MHz versus 100 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 10x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 2262
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 3.422
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 195.811
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 781
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 754
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1397
- 6.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 versus 233
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 5 September 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz versus 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 195.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 versus 233 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 950 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 23.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 versus 33.5
- 22.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 754 versus 33.9
- 23.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 195.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 233 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | Broadwell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 1478 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 100 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |