AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 Graphics und NVIDIA GeForce 820M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 65% höhere Texturfüllrate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 96
- 2.2x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 526.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2775
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 7.765
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 161.305
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.686
- Etwa 69% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 14.257
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 22.768
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1195
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1447
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 vs 847
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 vs 21 March 2015 |
Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 96 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 2775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 7.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 vs 161.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 vs 0.686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 vs 14.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 vs 22.768 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 vs 847 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- 4.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 810 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 35.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 33.5
- 42.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 33.9
- 55.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 60
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 810 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 vs 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 vs 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 60 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 820M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 7.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 161.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 14.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 22.768 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 847 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 495 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Codename | Wani | GK107 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2016 | 21 March 2015 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1474 | 1477 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 758 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz | 810 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 526.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 96 |
Texturfüllrate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 2,410 million | 1,270 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Speichertyp | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1802 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |