AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 820M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 65% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 8.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 2775
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 7.765
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 161.305
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.686
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 14.257
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 22.768
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 1195
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1447
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 versus 847
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 21 March 2015 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 2775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 7.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 161.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 14.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 22.768 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 versus 847 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- 4.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 200 MHz
- 35.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 versus 33.5
- 42.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 versus 33.9
- 55.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 820M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 7.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 161.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.686 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 14.257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 22.768 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 847 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 495 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Wani | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 21 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1474 | 1477 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |