AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 11.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2012
  • 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 4.25
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 929
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1210
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1524
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 15 January 2011
Texture fill rate 16.46 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 526.8 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 22612 vs 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.145 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1979 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2101 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

  • 6.5x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 27.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 929 vs 33.5
  • 35.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 33.9
  • 25.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1524 vs 60
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 929 vs 33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1210 vs 33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1524 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
22612
2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.145
4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1979
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2101
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33.5
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33.9
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60
1524
Name AMD Radeon R7 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Geekbench - OpenCL 22612 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.145 4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 206.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 85.46
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1979 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2101 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33.5 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 33.9 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 60 1524
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1457
PassMark - G3D Mark 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 176

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Fermi
Code name Wani GF106
Launch date 31 May 2016 15 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1440 1437
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 758 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 1300 MHz
Floating-point performance 526.8 gflops 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 16.46 GTexel / s 7.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12 API with Feature Level 12.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus