AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 11.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2012
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 4.25
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 929
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1210
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 15 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- 6.5x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 27.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 929 vs 33.5
- 35.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1210 vs 33.9
- 25.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1524 vs 60
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 929 vs 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 vs 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1524 vs 60 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 1524 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Wani | GF106 |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 15 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1440 | 1437 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |