AMD Radeon R7 M260DX vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260DX and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18010 vs 5091
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 October 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 vs 5091 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1047
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1047
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1019
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1019
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2165
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2165
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 195
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 899 vs 817
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2165 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 vs 195 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 899 vs 817 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18010 | 5091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1047 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1047 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2165 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2165 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 271 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 817 | 899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260DX | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | Oland |
| Launch date | 12 October 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1255 | 1256 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 320 | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260DX with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
ATIRadeon 9000
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX vs
AMDRadeon 620
