AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and ATI Radeon 9800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 331 MHz
- 13x more texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- Around 72% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 580 MHz
- 41.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 994 vs 24
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 331 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 vs 131 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | ATI Radeon 9800 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260X | ATI Radeon 9800 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rage 8 |
Code name | Opal | R350 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1206 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 331 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 1.324 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Floppy |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 9.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 580 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |