AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5753 vs 4071
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1631
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1974
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1631
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1974
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 December 2015 vs 1 March 2013
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5753 vs 4071
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1775 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1775 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 vs 1974

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 620 MHz
  • Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
  • 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1582 vs 994
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 162
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 1893
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 1893
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 620 MHz
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1582 vs 994
PassMark - G2D Mark 385 vs 162
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 vs 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 vs 1893

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
994
1582
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
162
385
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5753
4071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1893
2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1775
1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1893
2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1775
1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
1974
Name AMD Radeon R7 M260X NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G3D Mark 994 1582
PassMark - G2D Mark 162 385
Geekbench - OpenCL 5753 4071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1775 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1775 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 1974
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.219

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M260X NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Opal GK107
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 6 December 2015 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 1209 1212
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Price now $164.99
Value for money (0-100) 11.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 715 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 620 MHz 954 MHz
Floating-point performance 549.1 gflops 732.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 17.16 GTexel / s 30.53 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,270 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 202 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.3 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore