AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5753 vs 4071
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1631
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 1974
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1631
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 1974
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 1 March 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 vs 4071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 1974 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1582 vs 994
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 162
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 1893
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 1893
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1582 vs 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 vs 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 vs 1893 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | 1582 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 | 4071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 1974 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260X | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1212 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $164.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 732.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 30.53 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 202 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |