AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 240 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 997 vs 462
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2485
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2485

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX

• Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 168

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	997 462
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	168 175
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3158 2485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3158 2485

Compare specifications (specs)