AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 542.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4837 vs 3034
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 8.649
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.927 vs 0.642
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.763 vs 11.732
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.774 vs 16.3
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1280 vs 861
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 1443
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1280 vs 861
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 1443
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 542.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 vs 3034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 vs 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 vs 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 vs 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 vs 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 vs 1443 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 vs 575
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 148
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 141.079
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1384
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1384
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 vs 575 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 vs 141.079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 vs 1384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 vs 1384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 | 1088 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 | 3034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 1443 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Meso | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1437 | 1440 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Price now | $79 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |