AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 15.6 billion / sec
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 5.5x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 573 vs 330
  • Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 79
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 2239
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 2239
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 23 October 2008
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s vs 15.6 billion / sec
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 573 vs 330
PassMark - G2D Mark 149 vs 79
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2460 vs 2239
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2460 vs 2239

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 1625 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
573
330
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
149
79
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2460
2239
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2460
2239
Name AMD Radeon R7 M360 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
PassMark - G3D Mark 573 330
PassMark - G2D Mark 149 79
Geekbench - OpenCL 5211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 141.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 49.774
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2460 2239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2460 2239

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M360 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Tesla
Code name Meso G94
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 23 October 2008
Place in performance rating 1438 1435
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1125 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 1100 MHz 1625 MHz
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops 156 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s 15.6 billion / sec
Transistor count 3,100 million 505 million
CUDA cores 48
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 90 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV
Eyefinity
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 9" (22.9 cm)
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 2.1
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
CUDA