AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 15.6 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 571 vs 330
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 148 vs 79
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 2239
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 2239
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 23 October 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 15.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 571 vs 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 vs 79 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 vs 2239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 vs 2239 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 1100 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 571 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 79 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 2239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 2239 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Meso | G94 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 23 October 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1438 | 1435 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 15.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4670
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
