AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 333
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7070 vs 4928
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.26 vs 12.449
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 vs 455.796
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.653 vs 1.295
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 vs 24.566
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 28.025
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7070 vs 4928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 vs 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 vs 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 vs 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 vs 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 vs 28.025 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- 5.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1713 vs 1418
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 1747
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1484
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2449
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 1747
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1484
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2449
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1713 vs 1418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 vs 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 vs 1747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 1484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 2449 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 1713 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7070 | 4928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Litho | GK107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 933 | 934 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 960 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 GTexel / s | 31.36 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||