AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 736 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 467
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7070 vs 7032
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 vs 27.232
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 50.114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
• 3.8x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1851 vs 1418
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 17.26
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 476.075
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 vs 1.653
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1747
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3114 vs 1484
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2449
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1747
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3114 vs 1484
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2449

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1418 1851
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	676 467
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7070 7032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.26 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476.075 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.653 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.082 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.174 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1484 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2449 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1484 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2449 3356

Compare specifications (specs)